%0 Journal Article
%@ 1789-6339
%A  Vizi László Tamás
%D 2010
%F acta:29835
%J Közép-európai közlemények
%K Történelemtudomány
%N 4
%P 109-132
%T Ki legyen az aláíró? : vita a minisztertanácsban a trianoni békediktátum aláíróinak személyéről
%U http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/29835/
%V 3
%X The representative of the Hungarian peace delegation took over the final regulations of the peace conference that closed the I. World War, in the beginning of May 1920. The peace treaty dislocated Hungary  and  with  the disannexed  territories  millions  of  Hungarians  were  forced  to  live  in  the neighbouring  countries. The  Hungarian  government  could  react  for  this  dramatic  and  significant event in two ways: on one hand accept and undersign, on the other side refuse its signatory. After a long debate, the  government and the assembly –notwithstanding the public‟s dismissal –were under the necessity of the pressure of the victorious powers, and made up their mind of signature. This study leads on this decisionmaking progress, on the strength of the elaboration and analysis of the reports of the government meetings in May 1920. The first part of the study shows debates in the meetings of the cabinet council and the political circumstances of the decision. The second part, in  turn,  shows  the  dramatic  progress  of  the  decisionmaking,  as  a  result  of  which  they  pointed  the representatives,  whose  task  was the  signature  on the  4th June  1920 in the  Castle  of Grand Trianon. As a part of this, the  study examines the personal decisions, the possible  signatories, the  ones who previously  undertook  the  task.    The  study  furnishes  an  answer  for  the  controversial  question,  that why Dr. Ágost Benárd, welfare and labour minister and Alfréd Drasche-Lázár, extraordinary delegate were chosen by the government for the signature.
%Z Bibliogr.: p. 131-132.; Abstract